Comfort over Challenge

So I wonder about this issue of comfort over challenge, or vice versa. In the search for a life companion (or whatever you want to call it- that's a whole other discussion), are we looking for someone who challenges us or offers us the ultimate in comfort?

Recently, someone said to me, "Your generation is so picky about people, you really should be looking for someone that reminds you of how you feel when you are sitting around the house in your dirtiest clothes just being totally comfortable and at ease, in your comfort zone." That made sense I thought. Someone that made you feel, to quote a movie I can't recall the name of right now, "like home." I like that idea. That nostalgic and always untouchable aspect of home that makes you feel like the outside world with all its pressures and expectations and chaos is really shut out when you are at home. For myself, as a kid, home was the place I could truly escape into my own fantasy worlds in my mind without fear of someone breaking into them. I could get lost in the woods behind my house playing "Elf ranger."

However, those pressures and expectations truly test us as people. When we are always in the comfort zone we don't challenge ourselves. And if we don't challenge ourselves we are not going to progress as an individual or as people in general. I mean, as humans we are creatures of habit, and given the opportunity we could easily chose the easy path of habit and ritual, with no challenge to our beliefs or cultural boundaries. This is just an esoteric way of saying without challenge we will not learn anything new.

So this all leads me back to choosing the life partner (if you will). Do you choose the person who makes you comfortable, or the person who will challenge you as a person? And is it possible to choose someone who could do both- meaning, are they opposing forces or can they work in tandem? I don't know. I've had opportunities for both types of relationships and it always seems it is one or the other and rarely both. Only one example comes to mind, and in that case it was like a seesaw between the two, and also quite a rocky relationship as well.

At this point, comfort seems a little boring in some ways. I've challenged myself by going out in the world, learning a new language, seeing the different ways humanity lives, and felt like I progressed as a person. If I chose the path of comfort in those cases I wouldn't be the person who I am now. I might not be working at my career, or I would definitely think and relate a little differently to my students and colleagues. If I had a mate that challenged me then it's that idea of becoming a better person, of improving myself. Here's another vague movie quote- "you make me feel like being the best person I can be around you," or something like that. There is something amazing about that. I mean, FDR wouldn't be FDR if he hadn't had Eleanor there to challenge him. Maybe there really is some sense to that quote, "behind every great man (in history- let's be fair here) is an even greater woman."

On the other hand, to be able to challenge ourselves, maybe we need a place to call home. And home, which a vague concept at best, can come to mean the place we create with the people we love best- in this case our soulmate. Or maybe that's taking it too far. At least this person, with or without the soul part, is a comfort and will take us as we are, without criticism or trying to change who we are. They are someone you want to curl up on the couch with and watch a good movie (and accurately remember the quotes).

So, where do you fall on this issue? It's a quandary.